Debunking 'rabies is a fortune cookie'. Pt.2

JT asserts the existence of a fictional rabies ‘virus’ based on the Allen Institute’s use of an ‘engineered rabies viral vector’ in brain mapping.

Response by Co Pilot AI when I asked it the connection between the rabies virus and the Allen Institute Brain Atlas Project.

Regarding the use of the rabies virus, it’s true that some brain mapping projects have utilized engineered rabies viral vectors. However, the Allen Institute Brain Atlas project itself does not specifically use the rabies virus for mapping

- Response by copilot ai

I also asked Claude.ai the same question:

Other readers on his Substack have already highlighted the flaws in this line of reasoning.

As evidence, here’s a screenshot of JT’s response to a reader named ‘Ty’ who challenged this claim.

My comment on his cellular absorption post.

The article ‘Rabies is a Fortune Cookie’ primarily consists of ad hominem attacks on individuals JT has personal conflicts with, including Andy Kaufman and Amanda Vollmer.

Key observations:

Despite claiming there are no taboo topics on his show, JT immediately shuts down discussions involving virus isolation, freedom of information requests, and specific researchers like Christine Massey, Samantha Bailey, and Mark Bailey.
While legitimate data about rabies fraud exists, JT selectively cites only one vet tech, Amandha Vollmer.
JT repeatedly criticizes Andy Kaufman for no longer practicing medicine, which appears petty and irrelevant to the argument.
JT’s personal vendettas seem to compromise his objectivity.
His hypocrisy is evident in tactics like highlighting inappropriate professional conduct, such as alleging Kaufman exchanged medical advice for sexual favors.

The comment thread reveals JT’s hypocrisy: what occurs between consenting adults and their chosen method of energy exchange is fundamentally a private matter.

Note : The author of the article does not characterize Dr. Samantha and Mark as plagiarists. Instead, it portrays them as “victims of the lies,” alongside the author, Craig Hutchinson.

[

Poisoned Kiwi

Honestly Sam and Mark Bailey? Heterodoxies and The Truth Behind ‘A Farewell to Virology’

Warning: If you are a fan of Sam and Mark Bailey and will not tolerate criticism of them, I suggest you stop reading now. I’m sick to death of lies. I’m not accusing either of them of lies, they’re the victims of lies. My position is the record needs to be set straight. This essay does tha…

2 years ago · 91 likes · 96 comments · Poisoned Kiwi

](https://craighutchinson.substack.com/p/honestly-sam-and-mark-bailey-heterodoxies?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web)

I shared this information with Craig, who has also studied the fraudulent nature of virology. While he is not discrediting Dr. Samantha and Mark Bailey’s work, he alleges that an intermediary (jVB) appropriated his research and passed it to the Baileys.

I provided Craig with a link to what I consider the actual controlled opposition, which includes figures like Malone. So far, Craig (from Poisoned Kiwi) has been approving and appreciative of my comments.

Understanding the complexities within the medical system, we recognize that doctors in Babylon are human and inherently fallible. However, the integrity of their professional work should remain uncompromised - and in this case, Dr Samantha’s work has been commendable.

JT claims to have no personal vendetta against Dr. Samantha and Mark Bailey, yet he consistently attempts to discredit them. Despite mentioning that Dr. Sam Bailey blocked him, he persistently tries to mal-align their reputation.

Crucially, even if one were to entertain allegations of plagiarism (which Craig’s article explicitly refutes), this would not invalidate the substance or accuracy of their work.

Moreover, Ad hominem attacks is a poor way to prove a point.

After listening to over 800+ episodes of JT, a pattern emerges of persistent vitriol and personal attacks. While potentially dramatic, his recurring argument that “They blocked me, so I’m right” lacks a rational foundation.

JT’s antagonism extends beyond individuals like Andy and Tom Cowan to include Mark Passio, often misrepresenting Passio’s statements in his streams - a criticism I’ve repeatedly raised in YouTube comments.

The fundamental issue with indiscriminate criticism is the risk of throwing away the baby along with the bath water. No single person is infallible or holds a monopoly on what’s true. JT and Mark Passio both contribute important perspectives, and blanket dismissal of one by the other undermines potentially critical information.

For instance, Mark Passio’s “mental anti-virus” resource — which JT’s listeners might never encounter due to his persistent bashing - represents valuable intellectual content. Passio’s work on Natural Law, the Trivium, Freemasonry, the Occult, and Astrotheology provides an enduring repository of knowledge accessible to humanity.

Learning Natural Law has been my most powerful tool in understanding broader system dynamics. Passio and Tragedy & Hope’s effort in making this occulted(hidden) information freely available is genuinely commendable.